Real-world evaluation of cellular, acellular, and matrix-like products for pressure ulcers in the post-acute setting

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63676/kxwpnj30

Keywords:

pressure ulcer, Post-acute care, Cellular, acellular, cellular, acellular and matrix-like products, CAMPS, Real-world evidence, RWE, Bayesian Analysis, Wound healing

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of cellular, acellular, and matrix-like products (CAMPs) compared with standard of care (SOC) in promoting pressure ulcer (PU) healing among patients treated in post-acute settings.

Approach: This observational comparative effectiveness study analyzed deidentified data from the LiftOff Registry, a national database encompassing more than 18,000 patients and 23,000 pressure ulcers treated in long-term acute care hospitals and skilled nursing facilities. Wounds receiving CAMPs + SOC were compared with those managed with SOC alone. Bayesian propensity score methods were applied to reduce confounding and achieve covariate balance across key demographic and clinical variables. All Bayesian models were implemented in Python 3.12 using PyMC, with the Bayesian Model-Building Interface (Bambi) for model specification and ArviZ for posterior diagnostics and visualization. Healing—defined as complete epithelialization or closure—was modeled using Bayesian logistic regression with study arm and baseline wound stage as predictors, summarized as posterior means and 95% credible intervals (CrI).

Results: Before matching, the SOC cohort included 9,356 patients (14,740 wounds), while the CAMPs cohort included 136 patients (190 wounds). After Bayesian matching, 375 wounds were retained (190 treatment; 185 SOC), with comparable distributions of age, diabetes prevalence, and baseline wound area (mean: 23.2 cm² vs. 24.4 cm²). Most wounds were classified as Stage 3 or 4. The posterior mean average treatment effect (ATE) was 0.16 (95% CrI, 0.15 –0.18), representing a 16-percentage-point improvement in ATE with CAMPs versus SOC, or approximately a 50% increase.

Conclusions: CAMPs use in post-acute settings was associated with a significant and credible improvement in PU healing compared with SOC. These real-world findings support the integration of CAMPs into post-acute wound management protocols to enhance outcomes for patients with complex or non-healing wounds.

Author Biographies

  • ZWELITHINI TUNYISWA, Open Wound Research, Puyallup, WA, USA

    Zweli Tunyiswa, BA is an experienced healthcare management professional and an entrepreneur with a background in quantitative marketing and data science. He has worked in wound care since 2011 when he joined, helped build, and became a partner at one of the largest post-acute wound-care consultancies in the nation. He is currently the CEO and co-founder of Open Wound Research, a wound care data science consultancy.    

  • Ryan Dirks, United Wound Healing, Puyallup, Washington, USA

    Ryan Dirks, MA, PA, CWS is a Physician Associate and Certified Wound Specialist who has been pivotal in transforming wound management for over 15 years. Ryan is the CEO and CMO of United Wound Healing and cofounder of Open Wound Research

  • Howard Walthall, Venture Medical, Missoula, Montana, USA

    Howard Walthall, BSE, JD is an experienced Regenerative Medicine and MedTech executive with proven success in developing new, technologically advanced wound and regenerative medicine products. He is currently the Chief Product & Strategy Officer for Venture Medical, LLC which is developing and bringing to market multiple advanced wound care technologies.

References

Lan X, Tang Y, Huang Z, et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Pressure Ulcers From 1990 to 2021 and Projections Over the Next Decade: Results From the 2021 GBD Study. Wound Repair Regen. 2025;33(4):e70064. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.70064

Carter MJ, DaVanzo J, Haught R, Nusgart M, Cartwright D, Fife CE. Chronic wound prevalence and the associated cost of treatment in Medicare beneficiaries: changes between 2014 and 2019. J Med Econ. 2023;26(1):894-901. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2023.2232256

Dehghani M, Azarpira N, Mohammad Karimi V, Mossayebi H, Esfandiari E. Grafting with cryopreserved amniotic membrane versus conservative wound care in treatment of pressure ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2017;5(4):249-258. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.beat.5.4.452

Redelings MD, Lee NE, Sorvillo F. Pressure ulcers: more lethal than we thought?. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2005;18(7):367-372. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129334-200509000-00010

Song YP, Shen HW, Cai JY, Zha ML, Chen HL. The relationship between pressure injury complication and mortality risk of older patients in follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Wound J. 2019;16(6):1533-1544. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13243

Tettelbach WH, Kelso MR, Armstrong DG. A review of the proposed draft CAMPs LCDs compared to evidence-based medicine: a letter to the MACs for consideration. J Wound Care. 2024;33(Sup7):S16-S23. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.0169

Wu S, Carter M, Cole W, et al. Best practice for wound repair and regeneration use of cellular, acellular and matrix-like products (CAMPs). J Wound Care. 2023;32(Sup4b):S1-S31. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.32.Sup4b.S1

Armstrong DG, Tettelbach WH, Chang TJ, et al. Observed impact of skin substitutes in lower extremity diabetic ulcers: lessons from the Medicare Database (2015-2018). J Wound Care. 2021;30(Sup7):S5-S16. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup7.S5

Tettelbach WH, Driver V, Oropallo A, et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes of Medicare enrolees who developed venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care. 2023;32(11):704-718. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.32.11.704

Brown-Etris M, Milne CT, Hodde JP. An extracellular matrix graft (Oasis® wound matrix) for treating full-thickness pressure ulcers: A randomized clinical trial. J Tissue Viability. 2019;28(1):21-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2018.11.001

Mari W, Younes S, Naqvi J, et al. Use of a natural porcine extracellular matrix with negative pressure wound therapy hastens the healing rate in stage 4 pressure ulcers. Wounds. 2019;31(5):117-122

Sutherland BL, Pecanac K, Bartels CM, Brennan MB. Expect delays: poor connections between rural and urban health systems challenge multidisciplinary care for rural Americans with diabetic foot ulcers. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020;13(1):32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00395-y

Skrepnek GH, Mills JL Sr, Armstrong DG. A diabetic emergency one million feet long: disparities and burdens of illness among diabetic foot ulcer cases within emergency departments in the United States, 2006-2010. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134914

Kelso MR, Ohrt AR, Brunkan E, et al. Use of near infrared spectroscopy in post-acute care: analysis of real-world clinical decision-making. J Wound Care. 2025;34(Sup6):S6-S14. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2025.0172

Kelso MR, Jaros M. Improving Wound Healing and Infection Control in Long-term Care with Bacterial Fluorescence Imaging. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2024;37(9):471-479. https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000177

Kaplan D, Chen J. Bayesian propensity score analysis for observational studies. Educ Psychol Meas. 2012;72(5):863–880. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.928492

McCandless LC, Gustafson P, Levy A. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies. Stat Med. 2007;26(11):2331-2347. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2711

Zigler CM, Dominici F. Uncertainty in propensity score estimation: Bayesian methods for variable selection and model averaged causal effects. J Am Stat Assoc. 2014;109(505):95-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2013.869498

Nethery RC, Mealli F, Dominici F. Estimating population average causal effects in the presence of non-overlap: the effect of natural gas compressor station exposure on cancer mortality. Ann Appl Stat. 2019;13(2):1242-1267. https://doi.org/10.1214/18-AOAS1231

Li F, Morgan KL, Zaslavsky AM. Balancing covariates via propensity score weighting. J Am Stat Assoc. 2015;110(510):741–754

Li F, Ding P, Mealli F. Bayesian causal inference: a critical review. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023;381(2247):20220153. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0153

Carter MJ, Fife CE, Walker D, Thomson B. Estimating the applicability of wound care randomized controlled trials to general wound-care populations by estimating the percentage of individuals excluded from a typical wound-care population in such trials. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009;22(7):316-324. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000305486.06358.e0

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Real-world evaluation of cellular, acellular, and matrix-like products for pressure ulcers in the post-acute setting. (2025). International Journal of Tissue Repair, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.63676/kxwpnj30