Evaluation of intact fish skin grafts plus standard care in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: an interim analysis of the THOR trial

Authors

  • Thomas E Serena Author
  • Brianna Tramelli Author
  • Barkley Booker Author
  • Emily King Author
  • Dereck Shi Author
  • John C Lantis Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63676/zf9c6s39

Keywords:

interim analysis, venous leg ulcer, chronic wounds, tissue regeneration, Cellular, acellular, and matrix-like products

Abstract

Background: Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are nonhealing wounds that pose considerable clinical and economic challenges. Healing outcomes with existing standard-of-care (SOC) remain limited, creating a pressing need for more effective therapeutic options

Methods: An interim analysis of this randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial evaluated intact fish skin graft (IFSG) and SOC versus SOC alone in nonhealing VLUs. The primary end-point was the percentage of target ulcers achieving complete wound closure in 12 weeks, defined as 100% re-epithelialization without drainage for two consecutive weeks, confirmed by blinded independent review.

Results: The statistical analysis revealed that the treatment arm trended toward improved full wound closure at 12 weeks over SOC by 1.52 (credible interval: 1.37–2.22) in terms of relative risk (Treatment/SOC). This translates to an improvement of 8.53% (credible interval: 5.60%-19.7%) in percentage terms. In the ITT population, the IFSG + SOC arm achieved a 47.6% closure rate versus 21.7% with SOC alone, a 25.9% absolute gain that was not statistically significant (n = 21, 95% CI -0.02% to 0.493%, p = 0.07, α = 0.05). In the ITT and PP population, IFSG + SOC achieved a higher mean area reduction than SOC.

Conclusion: The interim analysis demonstrated a positive trend favoring IFSG products over SOC alone. While the present interim analysis provides promising early results, limitations inherent to its preliminary nature warrant consideration. The alignment of these interim findings with the broader body of evidence reinforces biological plausibility and strengthens confidence that the final analysis will yield clinically meaningful results supported by high-quality evidence.

References

1. Sierra-Juárez MA, et al. Chronic venous disease: Literature review. Revista Médica Del Hospital General de México. 2021; 84(2),26. https://doi.org/10.24875/hgmx.20000072

2. Harrisson MB, Graham ID, Friedberg E et al. Assessing the population with leg and foot ulcers. Can Nurse. 2001; 97(2), 18–23.

3. Abbade LPF et al. A sociodemographic, clinical study of patients with venous ulcer. Int J Dermatol. 2005; 44(12): 989-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02276.x

4. Kolluri R et al. An estimate of the economic burden of venous leg ulcers associated with deep venous disease. Vasc Med. 2022; 27(1): 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X211028298

5. Magnusson S, Baldursson BT, Kjartansson H, Rolfsson O, Sigurjonsson GF. Regenerative and antibacterial properties of acellular fish skin grafts and human amnion/chorion membrane: Implications for tissue preservation in combat casualty care. Military Medicine. 2017; 182(S1), 383–388. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-16-00142

6. Yang CK, Polanco TO, Lantis JC. A prospective, postmarket, compassionate clinical evaluation of a novel acellular fish-skin graft which contains omega-3 fatty acids for the closure of hard-to-heal lower extremity chronic ulcers. Wounds. 2016; 28(4), 112–118

7. Raffetto JD, Ligi D, Maniscalco R, Khalil RA, Mannello F. Why Venous Leg Ulcers Have Difficulty Healing: Overview on Pathophysiology, Clinical Consequences, and Treatment. J Clin Med. 2020;10(1):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10010029

8. Stacey MC, Sibbald RG, Evans R, et al. Canadian Consensus Statement for the Management of Venous Leg Ulcers. Int Wound J. 2025;22(4):e70415. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70415

9. Lantis Ii JC, Lullove EJ, Liden B, et al. Final efficacy and cost analysis of a fish skin graft vs standard of care in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Wounds. 2023;35(4):71-79. https://doi.org/10.25270/wnds/22094

10. Ruiz-Muñoz M, Martinez-Barrios FJ, Cervera-Garvi P, Lopezosa-Reca E, Marchena-Rodriguez AJ. Fish skin grafts versus standard of care on wound healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes. 2024;18(3):291-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2024.03.008

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

Data Availability Statement

The data is proprietary but is available on request to the corresponding author.

How to Cite

Evaluation of intact fish skin grafts plus standard care in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: an interim analysis of the THOR trial. (2025). International Journal of Tissue Repair, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.63676/zf9c6s39