Efficacy of placental derived allografts and standard of care in the treatment of nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers using matched controls: a randomized controlled trial

Authors

  • Thomas E Serena Author
  • Brianna Tramelli Author
  • Emily King Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63676/pjxy5s34

Keywords:

diabetic foot ulcer, chronic wounds, tissue regeneration, clinical trial design

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a severe complication of diabetes, contributing to high morbidity, risk of amputation, premature mortality, and substantial healthcare costs. Standard of care (SOC), including debridement, offloading, infection control, and moisture balance, remains the foundation of DFU treatment; however, many ulcers fail to achieve complete closure with SOC alone. Placental-derived allografts, classified as cellular, acellular, and matrix-like products (CAMPs), provide a biologically active extracellular scaffold rich in growth factors and struc-tural proteins that support angiogenesis, cellular migration, and control of inflammation. These properties suggest that CAMPs may overcome impaired healing pathways characteristic of chronic diabetic wounds. The RENEW trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled modified platform study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of multiple placental-derived al-lografts in combination with SOC using matched controls. Findings from RENEW aim to gener-ate high-quality evidence to guide integration of biologic therapies into clinical practice, improve healing rates, and reduce long-term complications of DFU.

References

International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th ed.; Brussels, Belgium, 2021.

McDermott K et al. Etiology, epidemiology, and disparities in the burden of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 2023; 46(1): 209-221. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci22-0043

Armstrong DG et al. Five-year mortality and direct costs of care for people with diabetic foot complications are comparable to cancer. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020; 13(1) 16. https://doi.org10.1186/s13047-020-00383-2

Lim JZM et al. Prevention and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. J Royal Soc Med. 2017; 110(3) 104-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076816688346

Ha JH et al. Association between socioeconomic position and diabetic foot ulcer outcomes: a population-based cohort study in South Korea. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1) 1395. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11406-3

Wu S et al. Best practice for wound repair and regeneration use of cellular, acellular and matrix-like products (CAMPs). J Wound Care. 2023; 32,Sup4b: S1-S31. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.32.Sup4b.S1

Forbes J, Fetterolf DE. Dehydrated amniotic membrane allografts for the treatment of chronic wounds: a case series. J Wound Care. 2012; 21 (6), 290–296.

Serena TE, Carter MJ, Le LT, Sabo MJ, DiMarco DT. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allografts and multilayer compression therapy vs. Multilayer compres-sion therapy alone in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2014; 22 (6), 688–693.

Bus SA, Armstrong DG, Gooday C, Jarl G, Caravaggi C, Viswanathan V, Lazzarini PA. Guidelines on Offloading Foot Ulcers in Persons with Diabetes (IWGDF 2019 Update). Diabetes/Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36 (S1).

Frykberg RG, Banks J. Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care. 2015; 4 (9), 560–582.

Lipsky BA, Senneville É, Abbas ZG et al. Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Foot Infection in Persons with Diabe-tes (IWGDF 2019 Update). Diabetes/Metab Res Rev. 2020, 36 (S1).

Hinchliffe RJ, Forsythe RO, Apelqvist J et al. Guidelines on Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Management of Peripheral Artery Dis-ease in Patients with Foot Ulcers and Diabetes (IWGDF 2019 Update). Diabetes/Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36 (S1).

Lu W, Hu M, Zhang Z, Slaughter J, Hingorani A, Oropallo A. Meta-analysis of cellular and acellular tissue-based products demonstrates improvement of diabetic foot ulcer healing despite age and wound size. JVS-Vascular Insights. 2025, 3, 100215.

Ruiz-Muñoz M, Martinez-Barrios F-J, Lopezosa-Reca E. Placenta-derived biomaterials vs. Standard care in chronic diabetic foot ulcer healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Res Rev. 2025; 19 (1), 103170.

Lakmal K, Basnayake O, Hettiarachchi D. Systematic review on the rational use of amniotic membrane allografts in diabetic foot ulcer treatment. BMC Surgery. 2021; 21 (1).

Padula WV, Ramanathan S, Cohen BG, Rogan G, Armstrong DG. Comparative effectiveness of placental allografts in treat-ment of diabetic lower extremity ulcers and venous leg ulcers: retrospective cohort study using medicare data. J. Wound Care. 2024, in press.

Tettelbach WH, Cazzell SM, Hubbs B, Jong JL, Forsyth RA, Reyzelman AM. The influence of adequate debridement and pla-cental-derived allografts on diabetic foot ulcers. J Wound Care. 2022; 31 (Sup9).

Haugh AM, Witt JG, Hauch A et al. Amnion membrane in diabetic foot wounds: a meta-analysis. Plastic Recons Surg - Global Open. 2017; 5 (4).

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

Data Availability Statement

The data is proprietary, but is available on request to the corresponding author.

How to Cite

Efficacy of placental derived allografts and standard of care in the treatment of nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers using matched controls: a randomized controlled trial. (2025). International Journal of Tissue Repair, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.63676/pjxy5s34