Processed amnion/chorion allograft and Excellion-processed amnion allograft characterization and trial design aligned with AHRQ standards for chronic lower extremity ulcers

Authors

  • Matthew Davis, BSN, RN, CWON, CFCN Surgenex Author
  • Pamela McKeown, MA, BS Surgenex Author
  • Jacob Michaelson, MBA, MSMS Surgenex Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63676/km40xx10

Keywords:

Wound Healing, Diabetic foot ulcer, Wound epithelialization, Leg ulcer

Abstract

Aims: This study protocol is designed to evaluate whether Excellion-processed amnion/chorion allograft (EPACA) and amniotic allograft (EPAA) accelerate closure and improve quality of life compared with standard of care (SOC) for chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and venous leg ulcers (VLUs), respectively.

Methods: This randomized, controlled, multicenter trial enrolls adults with DFUs (>1–25 cm²) or VLUs (>1–50 cm²) unresponsive to SOC after a 2-week run-in (<30% wound size reduction). Participants are randomized 1:1 to either EPACA vs SOC for DFUs or EPAA vs SOC for VLUs. The primary endpoint is complete epithelialization within 12 weeks for DFUs and 16 weeks for VLUs. Secondary endpoints include time to healing and quality of life (SF-36).

Results: Independent laboratory analysis demonstrated consistent retention of multiple regulatory proteins across Excellion-processed amnion and amnion/chorion allografts, with low inter-batch variability, supporting preservation of biologically relevant tissue components. These characterization data were generated within a rigorously designed multicenter randomized controlled trial incorporating Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-recommended methodological features, including a run-in period, standardized endpoints, objective digital wound assessment, and extended follow-up.

Conclusions: The findings establish biologic plausibility and compositional consistency of EPACA and EPAA while demonstrating feasibility of their evaluation within a robust clinical trial framework. Ongoing enrollment and final analyses will assess long-term wound closure durability and recurrence to further define clinical value.

Author Biographies

  • Matthew Davis, BSN, RN, CWON, CFCN, Surgenex

    Senior Director of Medical Affairs 

  • Pamela McKeown, MA, BS, Surgenex

    VP of Government Affairs and Health Policy 

  • Jacob Michaelson, MBA, MSMS, Surgenex

    VP of Product management 

References

Armstrong DG, Tan TW, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Review. JAMA. 2023;330(1):62-75. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.10578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.10578

Rice JB, Desai U, Cummings AK, Birnbaum HG, Skornicki M, Parsons N. Burden of venous leg ulcers in the United States. J Med Econ. 2014;17(5):347-356. https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2014.903258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3111/13696998.2014.903258

Rice JB, Desai U, Cummings AK, Birnbaum HG, Skornicki M, Parsons NB. Burden of diabetic foot ulcers for medicare and private insurers. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):651-658. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-2176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-2176

Armstrong DG, Swerdlow MA, Armstrong AA, Conte MS, Padula WV, Bus SA. Five year mortality and direct costs of care for people with diabetic foot complications are comparable to cancer. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020;13(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00383-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-020-00383-2

Armstrong DG, Tettelbach WH, Chang TJ, et al. Observed impact of skin substitutes in lower extremity diabetic ulcers: lessons from the Medicare Database (2015-2018). J Wound Care. 2021;30(Sup7):S5-S16. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup7.S5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup7.S5

Tettelbach WH, Driver V, Oropallo A, et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes of Medicare enrolees who developed venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care. 2023;32(11):704-718. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.32.11.704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.32.11.704

Wu S, Carter M, Cole W, et al. Best practice for wound repair and regeneration use of cellular, acellular and matrix-like products (CAMPs). J Wound Care. 2023;32(Sup4b):S1-S31. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.32.Sup4b.S1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.32.Sup4b.S1

Padula WV, Ramanathan S, Cohen BG, Rogan G, Armstrong DG. Comparative Effectiveness of Placental Allografts in the Treatment of Diabetic Lower Extremity Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers in U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study Using Real-World Evidence. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2024;13(7):350-362. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0143

Koob TJ, Rennert R, Zabek N, et al. Biological properties of dehydrated human amnion/chorion composite graft: implications for chronic wound healing. Int Wound J. 2013;10(5):493-500. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12140

Protzman NM, Mao Y, Long D, et al. Placental-Derived Biomaterials and Their Application to Wound Healing: A Review. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023;10(7):829. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070829 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070829

Snyder D, Sullivan N, Margolis D, Schoelles K. Skin Substitutes for Treating Chronic Wounds. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); February 2, 2020

Tettelbach W, Cazzell S, Reyzelman AM, Sigal F, Caporusso JM, Agnew PS. A confirmatory study on the efficacy of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane dHACM allograft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled study of 110 patients from 14 wound clinics. Int Wound J. 2019;16(1):19-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12976

Tettelbach W, Cazzell S, Sigal F, et al. A multicentre prospective randomised controlled comparative parallel study of dehydrated human umbilical cord (EpiCord) allograft for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2019;16(1):122-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13001

Towler MA, Rush EW, Richardson MK, Williams CL. Randomized, Prospective, Blinded-Enrollment, Head-To-Head Venous Leg Ulcer Healing Trial Comparing Living, Bioengineered Skin Graft Substitute (Apligraf) with Living, Cryopreserved, Human Skin Allograft (TheraSkin). Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2018;35(3):357-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2018.02.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2018.02.006

Tettelbach WH, Armstrong DG, Chang TJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allografts in lower extremity diabetic ulcer treatment. J Wound Care. 2022;31(Sup2):S10-S31. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2022.31.Sup2.S10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2022.31.Sup2.S10

Tettelbach WH, Driver V, Oropallo A, et al. Dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane to treat venous leg ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Wound Care. 2024;33(Sup3):S24-S38. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.33.Sup3.S24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2024.33.Sup3.S24

Downloads

Published

2026-09-16

Data Availability Statement

Data available upon request to the corresponding author.

How to Cite

Processed amnion/chorion allograft and Excellion-processed amnion allograft characterization and trial design aligned with AHRQ standards for chronic lower extremity ulcers. (2026). International Journal of Tissue Repair, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.63676/km40xx10

Similar Articles

1-10 of 64

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.